Re: [opendiag] Nissan Interfacing Project

From: highlander <gorgar@...>
Date: Wed Sep 10 2003 - 18:01:14 CEST

I do not know for your Nissan but on one web site have instructions how to
make so called chiptuning for better perfomance for other Nisaan,file is free for download,
but is protected by password(rar) .In that case you must unsolder chip,reprograming with new
dump or put new chip with appropriate data and that is all.If you are interest in chiptuning some
firms offer tool for chiptuning even through the OBD2 connector.
That is in the most case with firms in Germany.I am visit one website but i am forget whichone,they sale tool for
chiptunnig over diagnose connector.I tell you this that you know that is possible.
Regards from Serbia

----- Original Message -----
From: turbans_turkey
To: opendiag@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 2:55 PM
Subject: [opendiag] Nissan Interfacing Project

Hello everyone,

I have recently taken a newfound interest in the challenge of ECU
interfacing with my '96 Nissan Maxima (OBD-II compliant/VQ30DE
engine). Anyway, my goal is this - to basically make a little
monitoring station that can grab as much information as possible (no
matter how useless) while driving, so that it's real time. I'm a
Computer Engineer, so the hardware part isn't the big problem, but
the communication protocol(s) on the other hand are what seems to be
the problem. I have 3 proposed solutions to my project, and I was
hoping if I could obtain some clarification as to the validity of
them.

All the various sensors tie directly into ECU, and one can
communicate to the ECU through the OBD-II protocol, correct? But this
will only provide limited information, and won't allow any
modifications (if I wanted to tweak for power or whatever). So
strictly using OBD-II, I could probably obtain most of the relevant
information about performance, but I could not change anything,
correct? So this is one option for monitoring, just talk through OBD-
II.

If I don't want to use OBD-II (or as an extra), I could tie directly
into the sensors, correct? As in between where the sensors interface
to the ECU. This way, I wouldn't have to use OBD-II, and I could get
more 'raw' information. HOwever, each sensor is different, and they
all have different characteristic curves I'm sure, which makes things
a bit more difficult. But it's still an option, correct?

These seem to be the two obvious solutions, right? Now, the
limitation in both of these is that I cannot modify engine
parameters. For that, I would need to go directly into the ECU,
right? And modify it's EPROM. IF I wanted to do this, I would have to
obtain a memory map of the EPROM (which, by far, seems the most
challenging task) - but if I obtained this, or at least part of it,
not only could I view all the parameters that I could in the previous
solutions, but I could modify them as well, correct?

The last option would be nice, if viable, but I'm hoping that maybe
I could modify parameters through another mechanism (if I'm lucky).
Either way, like I said, the goal is to monitor, not modify - it
would be nice if I could do both though. Any comments are appreciated,

Jai

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
opendiag-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 
Received on Wed Sep 10 09:51:22 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 02 2008 - 00:56:01 CET